
For our purposes, the rise in literacy is perhaps the most significant social change of the era. In part due to the establishment of a system of schools for the poor, in part to the increasing size of the middle classes, and in both cases driven by economic need more than a desire to enlighten the masses; between 1840 and 1900 a largely illiterate Britain was transformed into a land of nearly universal literacy. The new and growing mass audience drove a revolution in print, with newspapers vastly increasing their circulation, and made a world in which a serialized popular author such as Dickens gained wealth and fame far beyond anything available to writers of earlier generations. For those who could not afford to purchase books to feed their appetites, there was Mudie's Library, the Netflix of its day; if Mudie's felt that a book would do well, they would purchase 2,000 to 3,000 copies at a stroke, greatly affecting the shape of popular literacy.
We ourselves, in fact, stand in an institution -- the former Rhode Island Normal School -- which was in many regards the equivalent of the Victorian teacher training schools. And, ironically enough, the great project of establishing and funding a public education for all, the offspring of this era (and of advocates such as Henry Barnard and Horace Mann) is now, once again, a problem child, with great debates raging on school reform and how to fix the system.
Exploitative labor, the other great social problem of the Victorian era, continues as well, though mostly out of sight of the middle-class consumers of today. We've outsourced our exploitation to China, the Philippines, and American Samoa, and hidden our piece-workers deep in the recesses of half-abandoned buildings. Those who harvest our crops are equally invisible, though there if we care to see them. So until such work can be completely automated -- or until, as Stephen Colbert has said, we can develop "vegetables that pick themselves," we too must address this still-neglected problem of human society.
All this calls into question another idea we inherited from the Victorians: progress. If, a hundred a nine years after the death of Queen Victoria, we're still struggling with the same old social issues, what can "progress" mean?
The formal definition of progress is to “forward or onward advancements towards something”. The Victorian Era was a huge time period of scientific, economic, and social movement. As seen in Jekyll and Hyde, science was evolving greatly. There were so many new breakthroughs and discoveries, and as we read the novel, we see that Dr. Jekyll has made some discoveries of his own and is living an alternate life as an evil man named Mr. Hyde. Dr. Jekyll is a wealthy man with a good reputation in London, so no one ever thought to connect him to the cruel, disturbing Mr. Hyde. Jekyll explains at the end of the novel that he had repressed all of the dark feelings inside him for many years, and that the potion he created allowed him to be his true self. Dr. Jekyll seems like the only man in this story who is showcasing who he really is. Characters like Utterson, Enfield, and Lanyon are very proper and care a lot about reputations and their appearances. The occurrences and connections between Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde confuse and intrigue them but they never once think that they could be connected in a scientific way. After reading this novel, I think I could give progress my own definition. It is working at something; it is making strides towards greatness, it is growing and developing over time. The Victorian Era brought so many advancements not only for London but for the rest of the world, and this novel portrayed a lot of these changes and people’s views on them through the inner thoughts of Utterson. All Utterson cared about was how other people perceived him, and he really did not want anyone to know that he was a part of any scandal. He lost his relationship with Jekyll by the end because he did not like the changes he was making to who he was or his strange connection with Hyde. The social advancements of the Victorian Era were knew for Lanyon and Utterson and they did not expect that Jekyll, a man they perceived as kind and prestigious, could act in such a way. In today’s society, the world is constantly progressing and people are trying to process and adapt to all of the changes. People may act out or try new things, but our world is constantly evolving; we simply need to adapt to these changes.
ReplyDelete